↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The evaluation of older patients with cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The evaluation of older patients with cervical cancer
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s45613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Gao, Ma, Gao, Li-ping Song

Abstract

The number of elderly patients being diagnosed with cervical cancer is increasing, and the outcome of cervical cancer related to age is controversial. We conducted a retrospective analysis in patients treated for advanced cervical cancer in order to investigate patient characteristics and prognosis of older patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,283,127
of 4,508,612 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#329
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,355
of 89,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#29
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,508,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.