The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
A Review of the Mechanism of Action of Cyclosporine A: The Role of Cyclosporine A in Dry Eye Disease and Recent Formulation Developments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s279051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura M Periman, Francis S Mah, Paul M Karpecki |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#783,536
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#56
of 3,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,427
of 527,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.