| Title |
The costs of traumatic brain injury: a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s44625 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ioan Humphreys, Rodger L Wood, Ceri J Phillips, Steven Macey |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to review the literature relating to the psychosocial costs associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 446 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 18% |
| Researcher | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 83 | 18% |
| Unknown | 86 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 51 | 11% |
| Psychology | 41 | 9% |
| Engineering | 36 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 89 | 20% |
| Unknown | 107 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,285,438
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#47
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,774
of 207,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.