↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Descriptive epidemiology of injuries in a Brazilian premier league soccer team

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Descriptive epidemiology of injuries in a Brazilian premier league soccer team
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s44384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Júlio de Freitas Guina Fachina, Marília dos Santos Andrade, Fernando Roberto Silva, Silas Waszczuk-Junior, Paulo César Montagner, João Paulo Borin, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira

Abstract

Soccer, which has a large number of participants, has a high injury incidence that causes both financial and time burdens. Therefore, knowledge about the epidemiology of soccer injuries could allow sports-medicine professionals, such as physicians and physiotherapists, to direct their work in specific preventive programs. Thus, our aim was to conduct an epidemiological survey of injuries sustained by professional soccer players from the same team who participated in the Brazilian championship premier league in 2009. To this end, we evaluated retrospectively player medical records from the team, which included name, date of birth, position, date of injury, mechanism of injury, and type of injury. In the period of study, 95 injuries were recorded: 42 (44.2%) were recorded during matches, and 53 (55.8%) during the training period. Injuries occurred more frequently in midfielders and strikers. All injuries happened in the lower limb, most of the injuries were muscular, and most occurred as the result of collisions with other athletes. In summary, this study demonstrates that there is a need for greater safety awareness in the training environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Qatar 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 23 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 28 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,267,895
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#93
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,344
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.