| Title |
An Algorithm Approach to Phantom Limb Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s355278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob Boomgaardt, Kovosh Dastan, Tiffany Chan, Ashley Shilling, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lynn Kohan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 40 | 77% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,457,287
of 25,245,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#852
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,317
of 433,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#18
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,245,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.