The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s6645 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eve J Higginbotham |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,769,080
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#844
of 3,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,496
of 180,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.