| Title |
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study of Process, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s434641 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Íde O’Shaughnessy, Katie Robinson, Aoife Whiston, Louise Barry, Gillian Corey, Collette Devlin, Deirdre Hartigan, Aoife Synnott, Aoife McCarthy, Eoin Moriarty, Bryan Jones, Ida Carroll, Denys Shchetkovsky, Margaret O’Connor, Fiona Steed, Leonora Carey, Mairéad Conneely, Aoife Leahy, Colin Quinn, Elaine Shanahan, Damien Ryan, Rose Galvin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 19 | 59% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 22% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,522,914
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#162
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,378
of 333,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.