The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
The Role of CT Scan in Pediatric Airway Foreign Bodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s398727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mei-Lan Wang, Lu Hui Png, Jing Ma, Ken Lin, Mei-Hua Sun, Yi-Jun Chen, Xian-Chao Tang, Xian-Yun Bi, Ying-Qin Gao, Tie-Song Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,498,979
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#427
of 1,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,915
of 472,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.