↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Urology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
Title
Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment
Published in
Research and Reports in Urology, February 2024
DOI 10.2147/rru.s430744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Haffar, Alexander Hirsch, Christian Morrill, Adelaide Garcia, Zachary Werner, John P Gearhart, Chad Crigger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,489,203
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#118
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,422
of 381,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them