| Title |
Post-Doctoral Training in Pain Medicine: Too Little, Yet Not Too Late?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s462429 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott G Pritzlaff, Miles Day, Sayed E Wahezi, Michael E Schatman, On behalf of Pain Medicine Luminaries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,036,997
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#803
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,316
of 332,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.