The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Causal Effects of Lipids-Related Metabolites on Androgenic Alopecia: A Mendelian Randomization Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s445453 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lingbo Bi, Chaofan Wang, Yimei Du, Changpei Lu, Min Zhao, Yunbu Ding, Weiling Sun, Weixin Fan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,741,555
of 26,453,397 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#199
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,500
of 381,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,453,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.