↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine: systematic review with an emphasis on resource-limited settings

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine: systematic review with an emphasis on resource-limited settings
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2011
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s14559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan Ford, Janice Lee, Isabelle Andrieux-Meyer, Alexandra Calmy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 12%
Chemistry 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Mathematics 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,921,330
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#91
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,117
of 123,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.