The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine: systematic review with an emphasis on resource-limited settings
|
---|---|
Published in |
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/hiv.s14559 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nathan Ford, Janice Lee, Isabelle Andrieux-Meyer, Alexandra Calmy |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 18% |
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 19% |
Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 37% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 12% |
Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Mathematics | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,921,330
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#91
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,117
of 123,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.