| Title |
Vigilance for pain-related faces in a primary task paradigm: an ERP study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s45097 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Lautenbacher, Oliver Dittmar, Corinna Baum, Raphaela Schneider, Edmund Keogh, Miriam Kunz |
| Abstract |
Pain-related stimuli are supposed to be automatically prioritized over other stimuli. This prioritization has often been tested using primary task paradigms in which pain information is irrelevant for completing the explicitly posed task. Task-irrelevant stimuli are only processed if they are very salient, and pain-related stimuli are assumed to be salient enough. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,572
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,231
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.