↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Infant anaphylaxis: the importance of early recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 496)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
28 X users
facebook
39 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Infant anaphylaxis: the importance of early recognition
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s42694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amrita Dosanjh

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is an acute severe reaction involving multiple systems that results from a rapid release of inflammatory mediators. Patients with asthma and prior allergic reactions are at risk for anaphylaxis. Infants can present a special challenge, as the hallmark symptoms and signs of anaphylaxis may be mistaken as normal findings. These include drooling, vomiting or diarrhea, scratching, and drowsiness. The clinical manifestations of anaphylaxis are broad, as a result of it being a systemic response to an external agent. Among infants and children, there are often respiratory and cutaneous findings. There also can be subtle signs and symptoms, which can often be missed or the findings misinterpreted as normal for developmental age. The incidence of anaphylaxis has increased globally among children presenting with allergic reactions. Early recognition of the signs and symptoms is crucial to effective diagnosis and treatment. This is particularly true among infants 13 months of age or younger who are nonverbal and may have subtle signs and symptoms of a life-threatening reaction to allergens. The purpose of this article is to highlight the differential clinical presentations of young children with anaphylaxis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#426,496
of 24,077,666 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#10
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,057
of 198,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them