↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A survey of eMedia-delivered interventions for schizophrenia used in randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
A survey of eMedia-delivered interventions for schizophrenia used in randomized controlled trials
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s115897
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farooq Naeem, Tariq Munshi, Shuo Xiang, Megan Yang, Farhad Shokraneh, Yumeen Syed, Muhammad Ayub, Clive E Adams, Saeed Farooq

Abstract

Randomized trials evaluating electronic Media (eMedia) delivery of interventions are increasingly frequent in mental health. Although a number of reviews have reported efficacy of these interventions, none has reviewed the type of eMedia interventions and quality of their description. We therefore decided to conduct a survey of eMedia-delivered interventions for schizophrenia. We surveyed all relevant trials reliably identified in the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's comprehensive register of trials by authors working independently. Data were extracted regarding the size of the trial, interventions, outcomes and how well the intervention was described. eMedia delivery of interventions is increasingly frequent in trials relevant to the care of people with schizophrenia. The trials varied considerably in sample sizes (mean =123, median =87, range =20-507), and interventions were diverse, rarely evaluating the same approaches and were poorly reported. This makes replication impossible. Outcomes in these studies are limited, have not been noted to be chosen by end users and seem unlikely to be easy to apply in routine care. No study reported on potential adverse effects or cost, end users satisfaction or ease of use. None of the papers mentioned the use of CONSORT eHealth guidelines. There is a need to improve reporting and testing of psychosocial interventions delivered by eMedia. New trials should comply with CONSORT eHealth guidance on design, conduct and reporting, and existing CONSORT should be updated regularly, as the field is constantly evolving.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Psychology 13 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,519,165
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,248
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,774
of 422,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#25
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.