↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Update on the safety and bioequivalence of biosimilars – focus on enoxaparin

Overview of attention for article published in Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Update on the safety and bioequivalence of biosimilars – focus on enoxaparin
Published in
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/dhps.s28813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter Jeske, Jeanine M Walenga, Debra Hoppensteadt, Jawed Fareed

Abstract

Generic forms of chemically-derived drugs must exhibit chemical identity and be bioequivalent in healthy human subjects. The use of generic drugs results in a considerable savings of healthcare expenditures. Biologic drugs are produced in living systems or are derived from biologic material and extend beyond proteins to include antibodies, polysaccharides, polynucleotides, and live viral material. Such drugs pose a challenge to characterize as they tend to be larger in size than chemically-derived drugs, can exhibit a variety of post-translational modifications, and can have activities that are dependent on specific conformations. Biosimilars are not true generics, but rather, exhibit a high degree of similarity to the reference product and are considered to be biologically and clinically comparable to the innovator product. Therefore, the development process for biosimilars is more complex than for a true generic. Guidance is now available from the US Food and Drug Administration and from the European Medicines Agency for the development of biosimilar drugs. Biosimilar drugs are expected to have a major impact in the management of various diseases in coming years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 15 27%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 3 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
#54
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,517
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them