↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Anti-VEGF agents in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): are they all alike?

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Anti-VEGF agents in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): are they all alike?
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s45193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Wasif Saif

Abstract

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, a key player in the angiogenesis pathway. Despite benefits of bevacizumab in cancer therapy, it is clear that the VEGF pathway is complex, involving multiple isoforms, receptors, and alternative ligands such as VEGF-B, and placental growth factor, which could enable escape from VEGF-A-targeted angiogenesis inhibition. Recently developed therapies have targeted other ligands in the VEGF pathway (eg, aflibercept, known as ziv-aflibercept in the United States), VEGF receptors (eg, ramucirumab), and their tyrosine kinase signaling (ie, tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The goal of the current review was to identify comparative preclinical data for the currently available VEGF-targeted therapies. Sources were compiled using PubMed searches (2007 to 2012), using search terms including, but not limited to: "bevacizumab," "aflibercept," "ramucirumab," and "IMC-18F1." Two preclinical studies were identified that compared bevacizumab and the newer agent, aflibercept. These studies identified some important differences in binding and pharmacodynamic activity, although the potential clinical relevance of these findings is not known. Newer antiangiogenesis therapies should help further expand treatment options for colorectal and other cancers. Comparative preclinical data on these agents is currently lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 2 3%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#358
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,755
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.