The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open access journal of clinical trials, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oajct.s34419 |
| Authors |
Fujian Song, Hooper, Yoon Loke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 22% |
| Norway | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 365 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 12% |
| Researcher | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 21% |
| Unknown | 84 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 9% |
| Psychology | 32 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 101 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#940,800
of 26,287,478 outputs
Outputs from Open access journal of clinical trials
#3
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,280
of 208,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access journal of clinical trials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,287,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them