The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
High Blood Eosinophil Count at Stable State is Not Associated with Airway Microbiota Distinct Profile in COPD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s453526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanne-Marie Perotin, Anaëlle Muggeo, Quentin Lecomte-Thenot, Audrey Brisebarre, Sandra Dury, Claire Launois, Julien Ancel, Valérian Dormoy, Thomas Guillard, Gaëtan Deslee |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,896,959
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#313
of 2,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,230
of 257,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.