↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Tenofovir-associated bone density loss

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,323)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2009
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s8836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iwen F Grigsby, Lan Pham, Louis M Mansky, Raj Gopalakrishnan, Kim C Mansky

Abstract

Clinical observations have revealed a strong correlation between loss of bone density in HIV-infected individuals, particularly in conjunction with the antiretroviral drug tenofovir, a nucleotide analog that inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase. The most compelling correlations have been observed in clinical studies involving young children and adolescents. These observations strongly suggest that bone density is being affected during active bone growth and development, implicating a role for tenofovir in bone loss. Here we discuss the literature and potential mechanisms for how tenofovir-associated bone loss may arise, which likely involves perturbation of cellular DNA synthesis and gene expression. Elucidation of the mechanism(s) involved in tenofovir-mediated bone loss will help in developing adjuvant therapies to reduce tenofovir-associated bone density loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#579,000
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#23
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,871
of 176,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them