| Title |
Characterization of micro-invasive trabecular bypass stents by ex vivo perfusion and computational flow modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s56245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kendall S Hunter, Todd Fjield, Hal Heitzmann, Robin Shandas, Malik Y Kahook |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 28% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 51% |
| Engineering | 10 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,626,234
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#825
of 3,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,019
of 236,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.