The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Usefulness of Computed Tomography for Evaluating the Effects of Bronchial Thermoplasty in Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/jaa.s452865 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sumiko Abe, Mina Yasuda, Kazunori Tobino, Sonoko Harada, Hitoshi Sasano, Yuki Tanabe, Yuuki Sandhu, Tomohito Takeshige, Kei Matsuno, Tetsuhiko Asao, Takuto Sueyasu, Saori Nishizawa, Kohei Yoshimine, Yuki Ko, Yuki Yoshimatsu, Kosuke Tsuruno, Hiromi Ide, Haruhi Takagi, Jun Ito, Tetsutaro Nagaoka, Norihiro Harada, Kazuhisa Takahashi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,905,193
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#438
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,801
of 353,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.