Title |
Association of treatment and outcomes of doctor-shopping behavior in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s43631 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheng-I Hsieh, Kuo-Piao Chung, Ming-Chin Yang, Tsai-Chung Li |
Abstract |
A variety of unfulfilled needs may trigger doctor-shopping behavior (DSB) in patients. In oncology, treatment results usually cause patients the most concern. This study investigated the association of DSB with active treatments received by patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2013.
All research outputs
#16,033,957
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#873
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,676
of 207,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.