↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Coccidioidomycosis: epidemiology

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Coccidioidomycosis: epidemiology
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/clep.s34434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Brown, Kaitlin Benedict, Benjamin J Park, George R Thompson

Abstract

Coccidioidomycosis consists of a spectrum of disease, ranging from a mild, self-limited, febrile illness to severe, life-threatening infection. It is caused by the soil-dwelling fungi, Coccidioides immitis and C. posadasii, which are present in diverse endemic areas. Climate changes and environmental factors affect the Coccidioides lifecycle and influence infection rates. The incidence of coccidioidomycosis has risen substantially over the past two decades. The vast majority of Coccidioides infections occur in the endemic zones, such as California, Arizona, Mexico, and Central America. Infections occurring outside those zones appear to be increasingly common, and pose unique clinical and public health challenges. It has long been known that elderly persons, pregnant women, and members of certain ethnic groups are at risk for severe or disseminated coccidioidomycosis. In recent years, it has become evident that persons with immunodeficiency diseases, diabetics, transplant recipients, and prisoners are also particularly vulnerable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 53 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 61 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,873,826
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#81
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,367
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them