↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Emerging therapies for Clostridium difficile infection – focus on fidaxomicin

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Emerging therapies for Clostridium difficile infection – focus on fidaxomicin
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/idr.s24434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fredy Chaparro-Rojas, Kathleen M Mullane

Abstract

The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) has evolved during the last decades, with an increase in the reported incidence, severity of cases, and rate of mortality and relapses. These increases have primarily affected some special populations including the elderly, patients requiring concomitant antibiotic therapy, patients with renal failure, and patients with cancer. Until recently, the treatment of CDI was limited to either metronidazole or vancomycin. New therapeutic options have emerged to address the shortcomings of current antibiotic therapy. Fidaxomicin stands out as the first-in-class oral macrocyclic antibiotic with targeted activity against C. difficile and minimal collateral damage on the normal colonic flora. Fidaxomicin has demonstrated performance not inferior to what is considered the "gold standard" available therapy for CDI, vancomycin, in two separate Phase III clinical trials, but with significant advantages, including fewer recurrences and higher rates of sustained clinical cures. Fidaxomicin constitutes an important development in targeted antibiotic therapy for CDI and must be considered as a first-line agent for patients with risk factors known to portend relapse and severe infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,623,140
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#179
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,357
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.