Title |
Evaluating the Waste Prevention Potential of a Multi- versus Single-Use Surgical Stapler
|
---|---|
Published in |
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/rmhp.s325017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Markus Meissner, Sabrina Lichtnegger, Scott Gibson, Rhodri Saunders |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 32% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#247
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,909
of 436,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#20
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.