| Title |
Systematic review and comparison of pharmacologic therapies for neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s45966 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonya J Snedecor, Lavanya Sudharshan, Joseph C Cappelleri, Alesia Sadosky, Pooja Desai, Yash J Jalundhwala, Marc Botteman |
| Abstract |
Management of neuropathic pain (NeP) associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) is difficult. This report presents a systematic literature review and comparison of the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic therapies for treating SCI-associated NeP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,496,297
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#476
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,612
of 194,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.