| Title |
Quantitative assessment of the effects of chitosan intervention on blood pressure control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s148064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haohai Huang, Ying Zou, Honggang Chi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,372,582
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#127
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,782
of 447,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.