↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Uncommon Sinus Valsalva Aneurysm Dissecting into the Interventricular Septum Linked to Infective Endocarditis: Insights from Echocardiography and CT Scans

Overview of attention for article published in Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
Title
Uncommon Sinus Valsalva Aneurysm Dissecting into the Interventricular Septum Linked to Infective Endocarditis: Insights from Echocardiography and CT Scans
Published in
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, February 2024
DOI 10.2147/rrcc.s452833
Authors

Said Ahmed, Mohamed Hassan, Ishak Abdi, Mohamed Mohamud, Mohamud Waberi, Ahmed Abdi, Abdullahi Hassan Fujeyra, Abdijalil Ali, Mohamed Hassan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,247,404
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,618
of 346,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them