The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Long COVID-19 and Peripheral Serotonin: A Commentary and Reconsideration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/jir.s456000 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
George M Anderson, Edwin H Cook, Randy D Blakely, James S Sutcliffe, Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 47 | 78% |
Scientists | 6 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,327,070
of 26,591,059 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#34
of 1,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,668
of 353,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,591,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.