| Title |
Surgical Efficiency Comparison Between Two Phacoemulsification Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s453899 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Ibarz-Barberá, Paz Orts-Vila, Fátima Martínez-Galdón, Noemí Martín-García, Pedro Tañá-Rivero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,941,934
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#424
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,754
of 339,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#12
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.