| Title |
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s124518 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin S Tan, SriniVas R Sadda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,607,220
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#394
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,402
of 325,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.