↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Superficial venous thrombosis: disease progression and evolving treatment approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Superficial venous thrombosis: disease progression and evolving treatment approaches
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2011
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s15562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria E Litzendorf, Bhagwan Satiani

Abstract

Treatment of superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) has recently shifted as increasing evidence suggests a higher than initially recognized rate of recurrence as well as concomitant deep venous thrombosis. Traditional therapies aimed at symptom control and disruption of the saphenofemoral junction are being called into question. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis has been reported to be 6%-40%, with symptomatic pulmonary embolism occurring in 2%-13% of patients. Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism is said to occur in up to one third of patients with SVT based on lung scans. The role of anticoagulation, including newer agents, is being elucidated, and surgical disruption of the saphenofemoral junction, while still an option for specific cases, is less frequently used as first-line treatment. The individual risk factors, including history of prior episodes of SVT, the presence of varicosities, and provoking factors including malignancy and hypercoagulable disorders, must all be considered to individualize the treatment plan. Given the potential morbidity of untreated SVT, prompt recognition and understanding of the pathophysiology and sequelae are paramount for clinicians treating patients with this disease. A personalized treatment plan must be devised for individual patients because the natural history varies by risk factor, presence or absence of DVT, and extent of involvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 29%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,918,985
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#51
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,672
of 130,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.