↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of Placido disc and Scheimpflug image-derived topography-guided excimer laser surface normalization combined with higher fluence CXL: the Athens Protocol, in progressive keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Placido disc and Scheimpflug image-derived topography-guided excimer laser surface normalization combined with higher fluence CXL: the Athens Protocol, in progressive keratoconus
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s44745
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Kanellopoulos Anastasios, George Asimellis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iraq 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,277,879
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,127
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,010
of 209,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#32
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.