| Title |
Combinatorial evaluation of in vivo distribution of polyanhydride particle-based platforms for vaccine delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s45317 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Latrisha K Petersen, Lucas Huntimer, Katharine Walz, Amanda Ramer-Tait, Michael J Wannemuehler, Balaji Narasimhan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,374,251
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#818
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,119
of 206,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#15
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.