| Title |
Conducting an article critique for a quantitative research study: perspectives for doctoral students and other novice readers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nursing : Research and Reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/nrr.s43374 |
| Authors |
David Vance, Talley, Pearce, Christian, Andres Azuero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 30 | 12% |
| Psychology | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,799,182
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Nursing : Research and Reviews
#22
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,255
of 213,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing : Research and Reviews
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.