↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Improved understanding of factors driving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic waves

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Improved understanding of factors driving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic waves
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/clep.s37071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Som S Chatterjee, Michael Otto

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains one of the most important causes of nosocomial infections worldwide. Since the global spread of MRSA in the 1960s, MRSA strains have evolved with increased pathogenic potential. Notably, some strains are now capable of causing persistent infections not only in hospitalized patients but also in healthy individuals in the community. Furthermore, MRSA is increasingly associated with infections among livestock-associated workers, primarily because of transmission from animals to humans. Moreover, many MRSA strains have gained resistance to most available antibiotics. In this review, we will present current knowledge on MRSA epidemiology and discuss new endeavors being undertaken to understand better the molecular and epidemiological underpinnings of MRSA outbreaks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 162 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#12,685,629
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#326
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,768
of 194,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.