↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lack of Efficacy of Suvorexant in People with Insomnia and Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Lack of Efficacy of Suvorexant in People with Insomnia and Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, December 2023
DOI 10.2147/nss.s434058
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Winkelman, Benjamin Wipper, Jordana Zackon, Bettina B Hoeppner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,862,239
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#248
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,121
of 381,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.