The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Formulation, development, and optimization of a novel octyldodecanol-based nanoemulsion for transdermal delivery of ceramide IIIB
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s139975 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Runping Su, Li Yang, Yue Wang, Shanshan Yu, Yu Guo, Jiayu Deng, Qianqian Zhao, Xiangqun Jin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Chemistry | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 46 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,827,149
of 26,090,071 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,121
of 4,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,133
of 332,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#26
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,090,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.