The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Bite force and dental implant treatment: a short review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/mder.s130314 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dennis Flanagan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Professor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 48 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 42% |
Engineering | 12 | 10% |
Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 47 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#442,523
of 26,124,608 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#8
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,923
of 335,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,124,608 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them