↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The Effect of Gua Sha Therapy on Pain in Parkinson’s Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
Title
The Effect of Gua Sha Therapy on Pain in Parkinson’s Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, June 2024
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s461958
Authors

Yu Chen Xu, Qiu Qin Wang, Meng Yuan Chen, Yu Jie Gao, Jia Yi Wang, Hao Tian Ge, Heng Weng, Ju Ping Chen, Gui Hua Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#14,791,704
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#485
of 1,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,970
of 247,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.