| Title |
Differential impact of chronotype on weekday and weekend sleep timing and duration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature and science of sleep, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/nss.s12572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie E Roepke, Jeanne F Duffy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,978,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#209
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,935
of 108,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.