| Title |
Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of cognitive and psychiatric disorders in patients with COPD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s123994 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel R Ouellette, Kim L Lavoie |
| Abstract |
COPD is highly prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Clinicians have long been aware that patients with COPD have problems with cognition and are susceptible to mood (depression) and anxiety disorders. With the increasing awareness of COPD as a multisystem disorder, many studies have evaluated the prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions in patients with COPD. This review presents evidence regarding the prevalence of neuropsychiatric conditions (cognitive disorders/impairment, depression/anxiety) in COPD, their risk factors, and their impact on relevant outcomes. It also discusses both assessment and treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions and makes recommendations for improved screening and treatment. The findings suggest that clinicians caring for patients with COPD must become familiar with diagnosing these comorbid conditions and that future treatment has the potential to impact these patients and thereby improve COPD outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 23% |
| Psychology | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,248,511
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#200
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,717
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#7
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.