The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Reliability of patient-reported outcome instruments in US adults with hemophilia: the Pain, Functional Impairment and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s141389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine L Kempton, Michael Wang, Michael Recht, Anne Neff, Amy D Shapiro, Amit Soni, Roshni Kulkarni, Tyler W Buckner, Katharine Batt, Neeraj N Iyer, David L Cooper |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,878,999
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#653
of 1,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,124
of 329,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.