The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Lung Hyperinflation as Treatable Trait in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s458324 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maud Koopman, Rein Posthuma, Lowie E G W Vanfleteren, Sami O Simons, Frits M E Franssen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#17,371,336
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,652
of 2,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,310
of 163,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.