| Title |
Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s44741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anastasios Kanellopoulos John, George Asimellis |
| Abstract |
To survey the standard keratoconus grading scale (Pentacam®-derived Amsler-Krumeich stages) compared to corneal irregularity indices and best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,157
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,925
of 206,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#35
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.