The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
A serum piRNA signature as promising non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s193266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ailin Qu, Wenfei Wang, Yongmei Yang, Xin Zhang, Yuhuan Dong, Guixi Zheng, Qiuyan Wu, Mingjin Zou, Lutao Du, Yunshan Wang, Chuanxin Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,902,959
of 26,268,316 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#412
of 2,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,804
of 367,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#20
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,268,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.