The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Relationships Between Success Factors in Daily Disposable Multifocal Contact Lenses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Optometry, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opto.s462723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah E Guthrie, Doerte Luensmann, Jill Woods, Jose Vega, Gary Orsborn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,805,928
of 26,536,755 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Optometry
#36
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,512
of 300,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Optometry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,536,755 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them