| Title |
Anatomic connections of the diaphragm influence of respiration on the body system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s45443 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Bordoni, Emiliano Zanier |
| Abstract |
The article explains the scientific reasons for the diaphragm muscle being an important crossroads for information involving the entire body. The diaphragm muscle extends from the trigeminal system to the pelvic floor, passing from the thoracic diaphragm to the floor of the mouth. Like many structures in the human body, the diaphragm muscle has more than one function, and has links throughout the body, and provides the network necessary for breathing. To assess and treat this muscle effectively, it is necessary to be aware of its anatomic, fascial, and neurologic complexity in the control of breathing. The patient is never a symptom localized, but a system that adapts to a corporeal dysfunction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| Spain | 15 | 15% |
| Italy | 10 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 9% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 593 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 13% |
| Other | 43 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 7% |
| Researcher | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 121 | 20% |
| Unknown | 179 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 96 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 4% |
| Engineering | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 65 | 11% |
| Unknown | 188 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#336,771
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#9
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,249
of 207,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.