The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Provider Evaluation of a Novel Virtual Hybrid Hospital at Home Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s354101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J Maniaci, Karla Maita, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, Francisco R Avila, John P Garcia, Abdullah Eldaly, Antonio J Forte, Gautam V Matcha, Ricardo J Pagan, Margaret R Paulson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,104,817
of 26,435,181 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#244
of 1,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,279
of 534,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#16
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,435,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.